In answer to your question, my anger is a defense mechanism to deal with the culture that devalues and disrespects men at every bend in the road.
I would rather take action on it, then discuss it in a Facebook group. I belong to the men's advocacy organization that sued the Selective Service System for it's obvious discrimination against men. The same organization is also suing the State of California, for it's refusal to start a men's commission to go with their women's commission.
With the feminists in human resources that openly discriminate against men, I hired a lawyer and obtained settlements for their open violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
When I have seen female doctors discuss their preference for treating female patients, I complain about that to the hospital administration. I also strive to warn prospective male patients about that, as well.
I have reported non-profits that only serve women to the IRS, as discrimination by non-profits is not permitted under IRS rules.
The mother of Jeff Younger's son brainwashed him into believing that he was really a girl. She legally kidnapped the boy from Texas to California, and found a judge that gave her the green light to chemically, and possibly physically, castrate the boy. Unfortunately, I don't know how to help Jeff.
Thanks for the message, Frank. Maybe where there's confusion here is that I think people can do two things at the same time: They can fight injustice AND interrogate their feelings.
Even if you and I don't entirely agree on what constitutes injustice, I think we do agree that all forms of injustice should fought (or at least I hope we do). That's not really the point, though. The point is that I wrote an article about how men have been taught not to interrogate their feelings, and you responded to that article by saying, essentially, "but men are being marginalized." True or not, that's a non sequitur that serves to distract from the broader issue.
Ryan: now that I think about it, I did two those two things at once: fought injustice and interrogated my feelings. There was a religious site that had pages and pages for “empowering” women. Their advice for men was to “cry more”.
So I wrote them, and told them that my objective in life was to cry less and not more, which is why I was then confronting them on their celebration of women, and their dismissal of men. I added that the only safe women for me and other men were the growing number of women that rejected feminism, and respected and valued men. They didn’t reply, but hopefully that drove the point home.
In answer to your question, my anger is a defense mechanism to deal with the culture that devalues and disrespects men at every bend in the road.
I would rather take action on it, then discuss it in a Facebook group. I belong to the men's advocacy organization that sued the Selective Service System for it's obvious discrimination against men. The same organization is also suing the State of California, for it's refusal to start a men's commission to go with their women's commission.
With the feminists in human resources that openly discriminate against men, I hired a lawyer and obtained settlements for their open violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
When I have seen female doctors discuss their preference for treating female patients, I complain about that to the hospital administration. I also strive to warn prospective male patients about that, as well.
I have reported non-profits that only serve women to the IRS, as discrimination by non-profits is not permitted under IRS rules.
The mother of Jeff Younger's son brainwashed him into believing that he was really a girl. She legally kidnapped the boy from Texas to California, and found a judge that gave her the green light to chemically, and possibly physically, castrate the boy. Unfortunately, I don't know how to help Jeff.
Have YOU done anything along these lines, Ryan?
Thanks for the message, Frank. Maybe where there's confusion here is that I think people can do two things at the same time: They can fight injustice AND interrogate their feelings.
Even if you and I don't entirely agree on what constitutes injustice, I think we do agree that all forms of injustice should fought (or at least I hope we do). That's not really the point, though. The point is that I wrote an article about how men have been taught not to interrogate their feelings, and you responded to that article by saying, essentially, "but men are being marginalized." True or not, that's a non sequitur that serves to distract from the broader issue.
Ryan: now that I think about it, I did two those two things at once: fought injustice and interrogated my feelings. There was a religious site that had pages and pages for “empowering” women. Their advice for men was to “cry more”.
So I wrote them, and told them that my objective in life was to cry less and not more, which is why I was then confronting them on their celebration of women, and their dismissal of men. I added that the only safe women for me and other men were the growing number of women that rejected feminism, and respected and valued men. They didn’t reply, but hopefully that drove the point home.